Saturday, August 2, 2014

The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou [Marathon Review - Final Draft]

“He’s the Zissou.”
-Esteban Du Plantier

            The critical and commercial reception of Wes Anderson’s fourth film, The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou, was and is the lowest in his filmography. Many critics disliked it, claiming generally that it was a classic case of style over substance, something the grand auteur has often been accused of having in his work. However, the opinions of this film have improved over time, and along with it, the number of Anderson’s fans has grown. This has happened with several films throughout the years, like Darren Aronofsky’s The Fountain. In cases like these, initial critical disapproval is overcome by cult fanbases, most notably and possibly in one of the most extreme cases with The Big Lebowski. That 1998 masterpiece was a box office flop. Many critics had different hopes for the film, as the Coen brothers had previously directed the critically acclaimed classic American film, Fargo. The film, however, went on to attain a gigantic cult following, now hosting a Lebowski fest in several cities each year. Though The Life Aquatic doesn’t have near as much of an audience as that great comedy, it is still hugely imaginative and creative, and is arguable the film that Wes Anderson was born to make.
            In The Royal Tenenbaums, the style was a mellower version of Rushmore’s style. However, here the energy that Rushmore possessed has returned somewhat, with a new sort of looseness in the camera. Symmetry is very rarely spotted, and the camera commonly feels rather handheld. Present, of course, are the well-known panning shots and crash zooms. But with The Life Aquatic, the style feels more like Wesian (a term I made to make it easier to refer to Wes Anderson’s style) with a touch of documentary.
            The film also uses some great background action. This is something that Wes Anderson is known for these days, and this is really the first time it is notably employed, and possibly the most extreme use. We are able to see dolphins nosing into a scene in the background, cats playing around, and members of the Zissou crew participating in rituals from afar (in one scene near the end, Klaus participates in an odd sort of team huddle from yards away).
            Wes’ writing is one of the greatest advancements of the film, most notably in his skills with subtle comedy. The Life Aquatic practically begs to be watched several times. With the speed at which the lines are delivered and the overpowering style of the film, the humor that many lines possess may not be caught on first viewing. Some perfect examples of this are lines like, “We might have them both mixed up or it may be the other way around…” and this brilliant exchange of dialogue here:

Steve: Happy with the piece, Jane?
Jane: What are you doing in here?
Steve: Am I? No.

            Because of this swift and bullet-paced dialogue, and the fact that I have had the advantage of having seen the film several times, I often find myself laughing alone during the film.
            With The Life Aquatic, Wes Anderson’s imagination goes absolutely wild. He makes up fascinating fish, and crafts a splendidly eccentric crew. He creates the Belafonte, a ship that is shown cut in half in one incredibly exploratory scene, so that we can see all of its rooms and occupants in one brilliant tracking shot. There are stop motion animation pieces done by Henry Selick, like the Crayon Ponyfish and the Jaguar Shark. There are also the bits of peculiarity that fill all Wes Anderson films, like a woman who seems to feel oddly comfortable topless, and a three-legged dog. This is all excitingly imaginative, with tremendous thought put into everything, like the made up term, hydrogen psychosis (otherwise known as crazy eye).
            One of the most fantastic examples of this eccentricity in the film is the score. It’s truly Mark Mothersbaugh at his creative finest, and most unique, using Casio music with awesome energy. There’s one amazing scene that starts with the characters viewing documentary footage that the Zissou crew has shot, and trying to see which piece of original music fits it best. We hear the amateur music written by one of the characters, and then as we cut to footage of the actual film we’re watching, not shot by the Zissou crew but by Anderson, the music turns slowly into professional expertly composed music with the same theme. This is an odd sort of breaking of the fourth wall. Also used is David Bowie’s music, sung in Portuguese by Seu Jorge, and also used in their original language at the beginning and end of the film, with ‘Life on Mars’ and ‘Queen Bitch’.
            More excellence is found in Bill Murray’s performance. This is the role that he was born to play, literally written for him. He fills the role perfectly, with great energy. With his best role ever, The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou is Bill Murray’s own film just as it is Wes Anderson’s. The supporting cast is also terrific. Cate Blanchett, in her only performance ever for Anderson, does a wonderful job. Owen Wilson acts in a role that is the exact opposite of typecasting. Out of his comfort zone playing a character that is humble and kind, he doesn’t show a bit of weakness in his acting skills.
            The supporting cast is filled to the brim with stars. Matthew Gray Gubler, now known for Criminal Minds, acts here in his first role ever. He acts as an intern for Steve Zissou, when he was in fact Wes Anderson’s actual intern. Michael Gambon is especially excellent and hilarious, delivering his lines with a certain brilliant nonchalance that fits perfectly into the Wes Anderson style. Bud Cort is also brilliant, and Willem Dafoe acts in possibly his most comedic role ever (he normally plays villains).
            The characters played by these actors are all well developed, as are the relationships explored between them. The greatest of these is the odd relationship between Ned Plimpton (or Kingsley Zissou) and Steve (or Stevesie). This relationship is not a simple father-son relationship, it’s a possible father-possible son relationship, and this complicates things astonishingly. More complication arises in the fact that both of them are romantically interested in the same woman, Jane Winslet-Richardson, despite the fact that Steve is married to Eleanor Zissou. Steve, in spite of his age, is easily the most immature of the two, as he acts like a child in his relationship with Jane, best observed in a line which he says to Jane, “Please don’t make fun of me, I just wanted to flirt with you.” He also takes advantage, selfishly, of Ned through his supposed relation to him, taking his inherited money from his mother’s death, and having Ned take his watch shifts so that he can relax in the sauna.
            Other characters are decently explored as well. Eleanor, “the brains behind Team Zissou,” acts distant towards Steve, seemingly having lost touch with him. Her absence throughout the film is part of what gives Steve the feeling of freedom to go off chasing Jane. Jane has been a fan of Steve since her childhood, but is disappointed by the actual man. As a journalist, she has a constant responsibility to write a good and honest article, but the article is constantly supervised by Steve as he inquires of Jane, “What kind of piece are you writing, cubby? Are you gonna screw us on this deal?” She is the head of the ‘love’ triangle that involves Ned and Steve, which she describes as, “so effed up.” And Klaus Daimler, though nowhere near a main character, is the most highly defined and developed of the lower crew members. The way he seeks Steve’s recognition and praise, dislikes the addition of Ned to the crew initially like a first child dislikes his parents having another child, and the way that he slowly comes to appreciate Ned are all interesting to watch as well as hugely amusing at times.

            With The Life Aquatic, Wes Anderson makes a truly tremendous film. Critics claimed that it was overly stylistic. They said that it was self-indulgent. These statements, though they have negative intentions, because they are absolutely right. This is Wes Anderson’s magnificent self-indulgence, entertaining and wonderfully enjoyable to all who love the great filmmaker, Wes Anderson. This is the equivalent of what fans of Tarantino would enjoy about Tarantino making a film that takes place in one room and is completely constructed out of insane violence and brilliant dialogue. When an artist with an identifiable specific skill or style completely indulges that trait and doesn’t care what the critics say, there is a great form of art. And that is exactly what can be found in The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou.

No comments:

Post a Comment